Conflicting provisions won’t affect validity, constitutionality of MIF, says Drilon

  • 📰 inquirerdotnet
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 86%

Finance Finance Headlines News

Finance Finance Latest News,Finance Finance Headlines

Despite containing conflicting provisions, the controversial Maharlika Investment Fund bill is still considered valid and may be transmitted to the President for signature, former Senate President Franklin Drilon said. | MAgerINQ

“So at this stage, that should not be an issue because it affects prescription and prescription does not come in to play until 10 years from now,” the former Justice secretary and Senate president explained in an interview with Senate reporters.“The issue is, given this conflict between these two provisions, does it affect the validity of the bill? No, it does not,” he said.

He recalled a similar incident in the past when there was an issue with the validity of amendments introduced by the House of Representatives in the budget bill. Drilon said it also just normal for senators to commit errors especially when they are in a rush to approve the Maharlika bill, which was certified as urgent by the President.“But let me reiterate this does not affect the validity of the bill assuming that it’s signed because thats the policy of the government. Number 2, the issue will not be material until after 10 years,” he stressed.

“No, the conflict in these two provisions would not affect its validity or constitutionality,” he pointed out.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 3. in FİNANCE

Finance Finance Latest News, Finance Finance Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Economic managers rebut UPSE’s MIF paper | Jasper Y. ArcalasTHE Marcos Jr. administration’s economic managers issued Tuesday an eight-page rebuttal to the paper published by the UP School of Economics (UPSE), maintaining that the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) is critical in the country’s economic development. In a joint statement, the economic managers answered point-by-point the arguments raised by some…
Source: BusinessMirror - 🏆 19. / 59 Read more »